Caterpillar Generators For Sale

truth does not exist

There is a bit 'of confusion ... It's something I often say, right? Maybe because I have this feeling constantly listening to our media to talk about what surrounds us. Lately, I remain puzzled by how we deal with the theme of 'impartiality'. The theme returns as in "various" in-depth journalism programs now back finally out the theme of "censorship" ... And of course you can speak again of Santoro, Biagi and Luttazzi Sabina Guzzanti ... At this point in the debate (if there are a exponent of the left and one right) or interview (if there is only one party) the exponent of the right that is questioned on the famous 'Bulgarian diktat' (ie one in which Berlusconi has said he did not like to see these Santoro, Biagi and Luttazzi in TV then did not have to be re-hired) comes out with a phrase that sounds good or bad is always the same type Karaoke ... And pretty much goes like this: "But they were quite biased!" ... Even at that Biagi was certainly not a Bolshevik ... And then of course down to emphasize that it is shameful that we use a TV with the money paid by everyone, right and left, to deliberately attack a politician and to campaign
for the left ... And here we are at the crux of the story ... bias ... I think that there is a bit 'too much confusion on this term ... Perhaps this confusion comes from a cultural revolution that began just to the left: even when the cultural hegemony had the church and the middle classes, left-wing intellectuals have begun to reassert the old Socratic principle of the doubt. In essence, the cultural barrier in front of the "We hold the keys of absolute knowledge," the cultural left had begun to sell the idea that it was not so absolute that knowledge and that in each of those monolithic certainties he hid the germ of the doubt. To Fortunately, this cultural attitude finally managed to dethrone these tyrants of knowledge and to revive the habit rather than to debate the opinions ... sanctify
The old guard has not digested at all but this joke has long sought to turn against the proponents the right of free thought free thought ... How? Simply said, instead of making a stop at pawing for opposing the concept of "opinion", have instead endorsed and pushed as much as possible until you get to say that if their truth does not exist, then there is no truth. The truth does not exist, in fact.
And so we come to today, where there are no facts, only opinions ... and opinions belong to this or that political party ... so anyone with an opinion-oriented ... unless it has the right idea: in this case has an objective view of the world as politicians who inspire ...-____-... Seriously, the question becomes if not a wretched father of journalism as Biagi can behave in an "impartial" ... The question that should arise spontaneously is: how can a journalist be impartial? Is it possible? How do you do?
me these questions I have done, because although I am able to think with my head and I love to put everything in doubt, indeed, for this reason, I said to myself: "What if the right Berlusconi was right? And if Biagi was biased? We want to exclude a priori this possibility? It would be fundamentalist "and are thus likely to fall where they wanted you to fall, the next question that I was raised is:" Is it true that Biagi has attacked the positions if Berlusconi Berlusconi himself? "Answer:" Yes "then" E true or not that Biagi has supported the thesis and points of view espoused by the left? "Answer:" Yes "
" So it's biased ... "I concluded bitterly came naturally ... then, after Bash against the wall for you to bait a trap so simple, I said, "But what she should say, to do his job as a journalist?" application which then became: "What he said then?" I am surprised to find a single answer to both questions : The Truth.
And here I realized that we had suffered the theft: now you can not say "the truth" because everything is opinion, as I said, then you can only bring an opinion ... So if you say something that supports a leftist means that six left, so repeat his opinion or he repeats yours, do not you both tell the same thing because it's true ... But this is absurd! It is as if one day a member of the left saying "Today the weather is bad," then turn on the TV and there is an air force officer in the weather forecast says that "Today, cloudy sky ..." and right onset because only the media but also the military is under the control of Communists who are against! But the gray sky is gray and stays! And not because he said this or that party secretary.
is not the fault of neither journalists nor politicians if Berlusconi has hosted at his villa in Arcore a mob boss for several years by disguising groom, nor is it their fault if one of its networks is not permitted and are not guilty even if it is under investigation for serious crimes such as bribery of judges! These are not "opinions" that the leftists thrown to the wind, hoping to damage the opponent, are the facts: if you have not invented them, as you could not invent that the sky is overcast. And if Biagi reported the facts which, coincidentally, are also reported by those on the left, not because it is partisan, but because he is a journalist and his work is to report the facts (and will not be a case if its transmission is just called "The Fact"). Neither more nor less Air Force officer who tells me that the sky is overcast. And if the right is unacceptable that the sky is covered because their program says that the sun should shine and be a good day ... well, I'm sorry for them, but I will not steal the Truth (or the freedom to leave the house with an umbrella) only for keep them happy and let's face did not lose a bit